The catch may be in the fold. The pun is in the journalism. The trick or narrative may be in the math and physics. The point is: what is a dimension? Not to mention: what is a point? A point may represent a perspective in space as well as what it may represent in view of the perspective. A point has no dimension. Two points represent 1 dimension or a line. Three non-linear points determine a plane or represent 2 dimensions. Four non-planar points, require 3 dimensions and represent volume or space. But dimensions are one level below the point[!]
Time is often referred to as the 4th dimension. But returning to a point as representing no dimensions, 4 points equilaterally spaced require 3 dimensions (x, y & z).
(1-21-16)
1.): Forward (Ironically), Para~graph Three!, Coordinary, Rough Philosophy, Order of Inserts.
2.): FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2016 (page 1), Literally , Nadir, Dimentionalism(sic).
Then there is the Platonic Cave(or ideal).
The tetrahedron is the most basic platonic form or ideal. At least in our geometry, four points are the most that can be in perfect contact with each other. Although a review of the perspectivism of Plato may be necessary.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query platonic form. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query platonic form. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, January 01, 1970
Saturday, November 01, 2014
FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE NOVEMBER 2014
11-17-14: Quarter Backing? or Patrick Henry'$? [!]
11-14-14 Not Just ... (~)-An Inconvenient Platonics?*
Carl Gibson, Robert Parry, Platonic Field / Robert Reich, Andy Borowitz, Platonic Form [!]
[(~)Crooked Timber ... ]
(...) ow!(~) >/< (aip) [co-op(T)ed] (~)=(s.c.)=scroll~click
* Image Caption edited @ tetra (~)(aip) s/b (fn2)
11-14-14 Not Just ... (~)-An Inconvenient Platonics?*
Carl Gibson, Robert Parry, Platonic Field / Robert Reich, Andy Borowitz, Platonic Form [!]
[(~)Crooked Timber ... ]
(...) ow!(~) >/< (aip) [co-op(T)ed] (~)=(s.c.)=scroll~click
* Image Caption edited @ tetra (~)(aip) s/b (fn2)
Saturday, January 11, 2014
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
What the Beck?
[Under-De(con)struction.]
OK, this actually works in the perspective of the way some use words.
As in De for Dem and destruction, and Con for conservative and construction. Heck even conservation. Oops. I think we get the flip-flop. Lack of perspective is the subject, and preemption the aim of their construction. This is a work in progress. I'm still chalking it up.
My friend Thrasymachus* is embedded in the above (con) link...
while our seemingly seemly nemesis might be lost in Flatland.
I have recently revamped my PBMP tetrahedron, to the Tetrahedron of Will or TOW. It all began with my reading of Plato's Republic, going on 40 years ago, and my presentation not in a Platonic solid form but in a Platonic pillar model. Justice being the point, with appetites, emotions, and intellect being the base. I cannot vouch for these as being my original tripod to the triangular pillar, but I more recently reconstructed this balanced purpose on the legs of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy coming together to evolve Justice, much as our constitution rests or rather works with the balance of three branches and rests or works on the people.
Words are sometimes only ideals, but in reality I must say they are always ideals, but in some they are missing the concept of perspective, if not even a dimension(or pun, just dimentioning it), and whether you seem left or right or middle the reality is not even in line or online with a spectrum. The Third Way might not even be enough of a perspective, but it is better than Linear Beck or my way or the highway. [It was purported to be the Clinton way in that the aim was a balance between the goals of the left and right of the political spectrum(Ideally to move the middle nontheless) but I might say that the Obama way is more balanced, and may point to answers that are not always just a balance between two extremes or even two parties, and many people understand that, even though we feel that our way might be better it is hard to let go of our ideals.
[I believe I have now finished construction of this post, but have yet to finish reading the first link, and my "What the Beck" referred to my own preemption or condescending reference in the previous post.]
* Thrasymachus: a character in The Republic, and nickname for a Neo-Con I know, who might more accurately be called a Beck Head, or Eon-Libertarian (which I just pegged). [I won't peg any meaning on the Eon part, only to say I(not quite) flipped Neo.]
[Disclaimer: My first use of the term phrase "What the Beck?" was just yesterday, and until I just googled it, I had no knowledge it was a YouTube Channel, and I only used it as a segue to MoveOn to other issues. A search also found the Daily Beast and Op-Ed references and I might have picked on the Countdown but not the Intelligent Design, but the Gee Oh Me Try is similar but I can't dig up that one.]
[UPDATE 3-17-10: The "seemingly" link does not quite buffer completely, and has moderate moments but lacks perspective and balance let alone appreciation of others or perspective**. It can certainly be understood why everything seems off balance, but it is another to have an intention to balance it or respect dynamics, human or natural.]
** pulled from second link in the context of Thrasymachus
OK, this actually works in the perspective of the way some use words.
As in De for Dem and destruction, and Con for conservative and construction. Heck even conservation. Oops. I think we get the flip-flop. Lack of perspective is the subject, and preemption the aim of their construction. This is a work in progress. I'm still chalking it up.
My friend Thrasymachus* is embedded in the above (con) link...
while our seemingly seemly nemesis might be lost in Flatland.
I have recently revamped my PBMP tetrahedron, to the Tetrahedron of Will or TOW. It all began with my reading of Plato's Republic, going on 40 years ago, and my presentation not in a Platonic solid form but in a Platonic pillar model. Justice being the point, with appetites, emotions, and intellect being the base. I cannot vouch for these as being my original tripod to the triangular pillar, but I more recently reconstructed this balanced purpose on the legs of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy coming together to evolve Justice, much as our constitution rests or rather works with the balance of three branches and rests or works on the people.
Words are sometimes only ideals, but in reality I must say they are always ideals, but in some they are missing the concept of perspective, if not even a dimension(or pun, just dimentioning it), and whether you seem left or right or middle the reality is not even in line or online with a spectrum. The Third Way might not even be enough of a perspective, but it is better than Linear Beck or my way or the highway. [It was purported to be the Clinton way in that the aim was a balance between the goals of the left and right of the political spectrum(Ideally to move the middle nontheless) but I might say that the Obama way is more balanced, and may point to answers that are not always just a balance between two extremes or even two parties, and many people understand that, even though we feel that our way might be better it is hard to let go of our ideals.
[I believe I have now finished construction of this post, but have yet to finish reading the first link, and my "What the Beck" referred to my own preemption or condescending reference in the previous post.]
* Thrasymachus: a character in The Republic, and nickname for a Neo-Con I know, who might more accurately be called a Beck Head, or Eon-Libertarian (which I just pegged). [I won't peg any meaning on the Eon part, only to say I(not quite) flipped Neo.]
[Disclaimer: My first use of the term phrase "What the Beck?" was just yesterday, and until I just googled it, I had no knowledge it was a YouTube Channel, and I only used it as a segue to MoveOn to other issues. A search also found the Daily Beast and Op-Ed references and I might have picked on the Countdown but not the Intelligent Design, but the Gee Oh Me Try is similar but I can't dig up that one.]
[UPDATE 3-17-10: The "seemingly" link does not quite buffer completely, and has moderate moments but lacks perspective and balance let alone appreciation of others or perspective**. It can certainly be understood why everything seems off balance, but it is another to have an intention to balance it or respect dynamics, human or natural.]
** pulled from second link in the context of Thrasymachus
Thursday, January 18, 2007
The Hit and Run Gang
and the book ends of history or
THE CON-TEXT : (The Pinnacle? 1-11-07)
[from which I resubmit the following segment on my tetrahedron of being, to give context to the book ends and book marks, and why history will be not only rewritten but replayed.]
THIS MATERIAL WAS NOT ORIGINALLY SO CONTEXTED: [Comments and links added.]
* * * * * * * * *
[Now another spin-off.][From http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0105-26.htm ]
A Platonic(Model) Narrative? Or Being the Narrative?
Politics, Physics, Philosophy and Psychology may be the four points but politics may be the pinnacle. The pinnacle could be considered by some to be a W as well, and certainly by the current president. But the reality is that We are all susceptible the behavior, thinking and feeling that We each are the pinnacle and the Power. But W can also stand for the Wonders, the Words and the Works, not to mention the We that is too often denied. For many W is only about the Win, but it can’t be without the We, or it is just about the One. It may just prove the legitimacy of this model, that one cannot be without the rest.
Then I read:
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1222-24.htm
* * * * * * * * *
There are several F words that can also be applied, freedom is the force that must have a form that must not be feared. A W which may get too much neglect is the want, while others emphasize it. It is all about what "I" want, while there are more "I"s neglected. The power of our ideas, our intentions, and our ideals.
THE CON-TEXT : (The Pinnacle? 1-11-07)
[from which I resubmit the following segment on my tetrahedron of being, to give context to the book ends and book marks, and why history will be not only rewritten but replayed.]
THIS MATERIAL WAS NOT ORIGINALLY SO CONTEXTED: [Comments and links added.]
* * * * * * * * *
[Now another spin-off.][From http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0105-26.htm ]
A Platonic(Model) Narrative? Or Being the Narrative?
Politics, Physics, Philosophy and Psychology may be the four points but politics may be the pinnacle. The pinnacle could be considered by some to be a W as well, and certainly by the current president. But the reality is that We are all susceptible the behavior, thinking and feeling that We each are the pinnacle and the Power. But W can also stand for the Wonders, the Words and the Works, not to mention the We that is too often denied. For many W is only about the Win, but it can’t be without the We, or it is just about the One. It may just prove the legitimacy of this model, that one cannot be without the rest.
Then I read:
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1222-24.htm
* * * * * * * * *
There are several F words that can also be applied, freedom is the force that must have a form that must not be feared. A W which may get too much neglect is the want, while others emphasize it. It is all about what "I" want, while there are more "I"s neglected. The power of our ideas, our intentions, and our ideals.
Wednesday, January 04, 2012
In the Beginning
is Rhetoric*.
Paraphrased: Everything begins with rhetoric.
i.e. there were many nice Iowa speeches
It seems very parallel to "all religions begin as cults."
Also very Platonic in relation to form.
In terms of the idea and the ideal,
not necessarily in kind.
Not to run with caricatures, but what is that look on Romney's face?
A hard to be humble when I'm lying look? Or a devil may care but I don't look? Or is that his do, or due?***
* I wish I could remember who said something close yesterday. Either a candidate or a commentator.**
BTW: ledeRship is often provocative [sic/pun]
Bring it On! The Table[!]
Footnote: [!] / Irony.
[** who else is there?]
[Related later comments Thom Hartmann Show.
Rough notes on Romney/Bachmann: He fears us being European. She touts China as example.
Sanders on Colbert, Citizens United.]
*** NPR & NYTimes ( retrack, field narrowed, what it means, Republican Strategist, Foreign Affairs, Romney, Obama v. Congress. Bachmann out, Dionne/Continetti, End Run Recess Appt., good riddance)
< previous post >
Paraphrased: Everything begins with rhetoric.
i.e. there were many nice Iowa speeches
It seems very parallel to "all religions begin as cults."
Also very Platonic in relation to form.
In terms of the idea and the ideal,
not necessarily in kind.
Not to run with caricatures, but what is that look on Romney's face?
A hard to be humble when I'm lying look? Or a devil may care but I don't look? Or is that his do, or due?***
* I wish I could remember who said something close yesterday. Either a candidate or a commentator.**
BTW: ledeRship is often provocative [sic/pun]
Bring it On! The Table[!]
Footnote: [!] / Irony.
[** who else is there?]
[Related later comments Thom Hartmann Show.
Rough notes on Romney/Bachmann: He fears us being European. She touts China as example.
Sanders on Colbert, Citizens United.]
*** NPR & NYTimes ( retrack, field narrowed, what it means, Republican Strategist, Foreign Affairs, Romney, Obama v. Congress. Bachmann out, Dionne/Continetti, End Run Recess Appt., good riddance)
< previous post >
Monday, September 26, 2011
The Be All and End All?
NOT[!] *
Nor,
Neither.
Not to trammel up the consequences,
but "Peace is hard work"
and so are economics and progress.
Not to catch up on the gaming metaphor either.
(See Tax Plan and "Fiscal Terrorism")
Not to mention actual tables.
[ T. O. W.]
Politics ---> Economics, Government, Religion (Values)
Philosophy -
Psychology -
Physics ---> Math, Meaning, Forces(Ge Oh Me Try)***
Leaving aside the dynamics of philosophy and psychology, the internal and external dynamics of thoughts and feelings should be noted.
Also note difference between theories and models,
not to mention** formulay.
* note irony puncutation [!] in regard to the INET dicussion of models in the context of "Moneyball" and the Bard.(next two links) But more importantly in the context of the Platonic system, which I call the Tetrahedron of Will(TOW).
** Or KOW TOW
*** not just to pun but physics is the base and politics the pinnacle in this GPS of whose will and what will happen.
[Update: 7-10-13 hilites added also labels(INET/The Last Word)
Nor,
Neither.
Not to trammel up the consequences,
but "Peace is hard work"
and so are economics and progress.
Not to catch up on the gaming metaphor either.
(See Tax Plan and "Fiscal Terrorism")
Not to mention actual tables.
[ T. O. W.]
Politics ---> Economics, Government, Religion (Values)
Philosophy -
Psychology -
Physics ---> Math, Meaning, Forces(Ge Oh Me Try)***
Leaving aside the dynamics of philosophy and psychology, the internal and external dynamics of thoughts and feelings should be noted.
Also note difference between theories and models,
not to mention** formulay.
* note irony puncutation [!] in regard to the INET dicussion of models in the context of "Moneyball" and the Bard.(next two links) But more importantly in the context of the Platonic system, which I call the Tetrahedron of Will(TOW).
** Or KOW TOW
*** not just to pun but physics is the base and politics the pinnacle in this GPS of whose will and what will happen.
[Update: 7-10-13 hilites added also labels(INET/The Last Word)
Thursday, November 29, 2012
BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger"
I have a dearly departed Android.**
More on that Tan Gent later***.
Lede Or Ship [!]
Or Iron Knee Chef!
[Kant]
Now that's the ticket!* Not[!]
*no SNL, but somewhere a Huntsman/ 3rd or 4th partisan Share 'n Angle.
**no, not a turkey(a 3G)
*** Curb your Journalism: Re-4mat'N.
(Ctrl-F 'n b.s. )
[FYI: "Blogger" is a dashboard for blogspotR's]
[Can?]
[Convenient Al Gore Rythms(square-bracket-eds) and Rubrics Cubed.]
...
[OW, not my We Ge! But DB(a) just in my inbox.]
a= exception to the Dash Bored[!] (link inserted later)
i.e. exception to the OW as in not just in, but recently ran across.
(original intent was "as")
[ Here we go again ! ...
buh dump ump ^ (...)
Form^^ is not function, function is not purpose and everything else is gravy toss !]
^ re: sort (Norman Goldman is no dump but known for his employment of sound effects, and fits in this rim shot of radio hosts. At least locally he fits on the air between Thom Hartmann and Randi Rhodes.)
^^ and the links here might need Platonic adjustment.
More on that Tan Gent later***.
Lede Or Ship [!]
Or Iron Knee Chef!
[Kant]
Now that's the ticket!* Not[!]
*no SNL, but somewhere a Huntsman/ 3rd or 4th partisan Share 'n Angle.
**no, not a turkey(a 3G)
*** Curb your Journalism: Re-4mat'N.
(Ctrl-F 'n b.s. )
[FYI: "Blogger" is a dashboard for blogspotR's]
[Can?]
[Convenient Al Gore Rythms(square-bracket-eds) and Rubrics Cubed.]
...
[OW, not my We Ge! But DB(a) just in my inbox.]
a= exception to the Dash Bored[!] (link inserted later)
i.e. exception to the OW as in not just in, but recently ran across.
(original intent was "as")
[ Here we go again ! ...
buh dump ump ^ (...)
Form^^ is not function, function is not purpose and everything else is gravy toss !]
^ re: sort (Norman Goldman is no dump but known for his employment of sound effects, and fits in this rim shot of radio hosts. At least locally he fits on the air between Thom Hartmann and Randi Rhodes.)
^^ and the links here might need Platonic adjustment.
Friday, October 28, 2011
Dimentionalism(sic)
[sic] is another tangent or dimensionalism [!]
Dimentions?
Two* Points.
*fore, six, eight
[Charts and Images]
Uncoining (sp!), will utilized (sic) or [sic] or [!]
Speaking of blocks, inside or outside...
SEGUE, my points here for further consideration:
The future of Occupy: Four key questions
Super Committee/Progressive Breakfast
Leaning Forward?
Weak in Review[!](Morning Joe)
IN PROGRESS:
Star Chanber
Para-Model
Martin Bashir and GUESTS.
Jonathan Alter and David Corn share their perspectivism of the 2012 GOP crop. What caught me was the "process of elimination" crack by the former.
Yet to insert or finish.
SEGUE TWO: The Platonic Cultural Model of the Tetrahedron given quantum form. Politics is about power and culture, but the latter may be the point. Politics may be the 4th dimensions of the phsyical, mental and emotional realities. What is the point" Who decides? And back again. I am not yet ready to overlay a tetrahedron, but it seems that the military represents an element like math, or a structure like religion and economics. It is a tool, and a force, not that religion, economics and goverment aren't. It may be seen that government is a hinge point, where there may be more politics in anarchy than tyranny. Part of this new connection(military) is thanks to the service of a soldier to which I give thanks again. His service was also in the slippery slope of rhetoric where the issue was who guards the "gates of American Democracy", which ironically spun out of control over the Obama/Jobs issue. There seemed a lack of appreciation or understanding of the jobs of the three branches of goverment and the relationship to defending it. The military certainly defends our security, but as for our rights, if they(our rights) were not used, they would be lost, and then what would they be fighting for? And if they were not used freely, they might be fighting for nothing more than what other countries are fighting for. But who am I to say who might understand that?
Dimentions?
Two* Points.
*fore, six, eight
[Charts and Images]
Uncoining (sp!), will utilized (sic) or [sic] or [!]
Speaking of blocks, inside or outside...
SEGUE, my points here for further consideration:
The future of Occupy: Four key questions
Super Committee/Progressive Breakfast
Leaning Forward?
Weak in Review[!](Morning Joe)
IN PROGRESS:
Star Chanber
Para-Model
Martin Bashir and GUESTS.
Jonathan Alter and David Corn share their perspectivism of the 2012 GOP crop. What caught me was the "process of elimination" crack by the former.
Yet to insert or finish.
SEGUE TWO: The Platonic Cultural Model of the Tetrahedron given quantum form. Politics is about power and culture, but the latter may be the point. Politics may be the 4th dimensions of the phsyical, mental and emotional realities. What is the point" Who decides? And back again. I am not yet ready to overlay a tetrahedron, but it seems that the military represents an element like math, or a structure like religion and economics. It is a tool, and a force, not that religion, economics and goverment aren't. It may be seen that government is a hinge point, where there may be more politics in anarchy than tyranny. Part of this new connection(military) is thanks to the service of a soldier to which I give thanks again. His service was also in the slippery slope of rhetoric where the issue was who guards the "gates of American Democracy", which ironically spun out of control over the Obama/Jobs issue. There seemed a lack of appreciation or understanding of the jobs of the three branches of goverment and the relationship to defending it. The military certainly defends our security, but as for our rights, if they(our rights) were not used, they would be lost, and then what would they be fighting for? And if they were not used freely, they might be fighting for nothing more than what other countries are fighting for. But who am I to say who might understand that?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)